Skip to main content

Intel’s big bet on efficient GPUs might actually work

An Intel Meteor Lake processor socketed in a motherboard.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Intel has a lot riding on its next-gen Battlemage graphics architecture, and a very early benchmark shows some promising signs for performance. An Intel Lunar Lake CPU packing a low-power integrated Battlemage GPU was reportedly spotted in the SiSoftware benchmark database. It boasts not only higher performance than Intel’s Meteor Lake chips, but also much better efficiency.

User @miktdt on X (formerly Twitter) spotted the result, which appears to come from an early qualification sample of the HP Spectre x360 14. The benchmark picked up that the laptop was using a Lunar Lake CPU, which is said to come with the Xe2-LPG architecture, a lower-power version of Battlemage.

HP Spectre x360 with Lunar Lake it seemshttps://t.co/wc8LQjMAgy

— Michael (@miktdt) April 25, 2024

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

In the benchmark, the chip scored 2,108.15 Mpix/s. For some context, Meteor Lake CPUs using Intel’s first-gen Alchemist architecture scored around 1,700 Mpix/s. That doesn’t sound like a massive jump at first, but the Lunar Lake CPU was able to achieve its result with only 17 watts of power. Meanwhile, Meteor Lake consumed 28W for a lower score.

The result also shows that this chip is using 56 Execution Units (EUs), meaning it packs just 7 Xe Cores. By comparison, the Meteor Lake chips it’s going up against have either 15 or 16 Xe Cores, meaning Lunar Lake was able to achieve a higher score at lower power with fewer cores. That’s impressive.

Unfortunately, it doesn’t mean very much. SiSoftware is a general-purpose benchmark, not a real-world workload. It’s testing the capabilities of the GPU rather than how it will actually behave in games and other real applications. Once Lunar Lake chips are available, we’ll still need to take a thorough look at performance to see how it stacks up.

It’s still a very promising sign for what the architecture is capable of. Higher overall performance at lower power with fewer cores bodes well for how performance could translate in real applications. It’s particularly exciting for handheld gaming PCs. Intel’s first outing in this world through the MSI Claw hasn’t been particularly good, so a more efficient chip would make a big difference.

Lunar Lake is still a ways out. Intel has confirmed the processors are coming in 2024 exclusively for mobile configurations. Given what we saw with Meteor Lake chips, however, there’s a good chance Lunar Lake will be available in very limited quantities in 2024, with more options available in early 2025.

Editors' Recommendations

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
All of the exciting new GPUs still coming in 2024
Intel Arc A770 GPU installed in a test bench.

It's already been an exciting year for graphics cards, but things are really about to start heating up. A series of leaks and rumors over the past year suggest that Nvidia, AMD, and Intel will all launch new GPU generations in the back half of 2024, with the three graphics behemoths' offerings duking it out for a slot among the best graphics cards.

We've already seen graphics cards like the RX 7600 XT and RTX 4070 Super this year, but there could be many more in the tank. Although each of the three major graphics brands have confirmed that next-gen GPUs are on the way, none of them have laid out a specific timeline. So, with the understanding that these release windows are still speculative, these are the GPUs launching this year that we'll all be talking about heading into 2025.
Nvidia -- RTX 50-series (Blackwell)

Read more
We might have an answer to Intel’s crashing crisis
Intel's 14900K CPU socketed in a motherboard.

Intel is facing some big problems with its 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs. As we reported on last week, gamers are returning high-end Intel CPUs in droves because of inexplicable crashes when playing the latest games. Now, we might have a solution, at least until Intel can tackle the problem properly.

The guidance comes from Falcon Northwest, which is a Portland-based system builder that received a rare perfect score from Digital Trends (read our Falcon Northwest Tiki review for more on that). Kelt Reeves, president of Falcon Northwest, said that the team has had "many long days of testing on many different CPUs that had developed issues here in our production and in the field from our clients." The result of that testing is a list of BIOS settings that should fix the problem.

Read more
I tested Intel’s XeSS against AMD FSR — and the results speak for themselves
Intel Arc demo: Ryan Shrout plays Shadow of the Tomb Raider on a gaming PC.

AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) and Intel's Xe Super Sampling (XeSS) are two of the most prominent upscaling options you'll find in PC games, and for one simple reason: They work with any of the best graphics cards. Choosing between them isn't simple, however. There are some big differences in image quality and performance, even with the same graphics card and the same game.

We've been testing AMD FSR and Intel XeSS for months across various games, but it's time to compare them point for point. If you're looking for a simple answer on which is best, you w0n't find it here. However, we'll still dig into the nuances between FSR and XeSS and what you need to know about the two upscaling features.
AMD FSR vs. Intel XeSS: how they work

Read more